Archaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyon

"At the beginning of this Introduction I have indicated how difficult it is to choose a general accepted name for the region this book deals with. In Europe we are used to the late Roman name 'Palestine,' and the designation 'Palestinian Archaeology' has a long history. According to Byzantine usage it included CisJordan and TransJordan and even Lebanon and Sinai. In modern times, however, the name 'Palestine' has exclusively become the political designation for a restricted area. Furthermore, in the period this book deals with a region called 'Palestine' did not yet exist. Also the ancient name 'Canaan' cannot be used as it refers to an older period in history. Designations as: 'The Land(s) of the Bible' or 'the Hold Land' evoke the suspicion of a theological bias. 'The Land of Israel' does not apply to the situation because it never included Lebanon or the greater part of modern Jordan. Therefore I have joined those who today advocate the designation 'Southern Levant.' Although I confess that it is an awkward name, it is at least strictly geographical" ( Geus 2003 , p. 6).

Archaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyon

archaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyon

Media:

archaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyonarchaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyonarchaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyonarchaeology in the levant essays for kathleen kenyon